Leaked documents from the free - market conservative organization The Heartland Institute reveal a plan to create school educational materials that contradict the
established science on climate change.
And yet, 400 years later, here we are: watching a public official tasked with guiding the educational trajectories of his community's children rail against the
accepted science on climate change — because its conclusions threaten to undermine the local political culture.
More on Congress and Climate Change: Flawed U.S. Senate Climate Bill Making the Rounds Copenhagen Climate Congress to Synthesize
New Science on Climate Change Report: Now 4 Climate Change Lobbyists for Every Member of Congress
The National Climate Assessment is intended to inform the president, Congress, and the public about up - to -
date science on climate change and its «effects on U.S. regions and key sectors, now and in the coming decades,» according to the National Research Council's review.
Humanity is in clear & present danger of losing the exquisite value to be found in one of God's gifts to humanity: the carefully and skillfully
developed science on climate change.
The leaders of the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change review of the
basic science on climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and files.
The book, in many ways an update to his 2005 version of The Weather Makers, is divided into three sections: the first is an update of
recent science on climate change impacts, and the second reviews progress in clean energy.
Stop booking «merchants of doubt» and all those who deny and distort the
established science on climate change — including Marc Morano (Climate Depot), William O'Keefe (George C. Marshall Institute), Tim Phillips (Americans for Prosperity), Fred Singer (The Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Institute).
More on Copenhagen: Copenhagen Climate Congress to Synthesize
New Science on Climate Change It's a Long Road to Copenhagen: Here's What Obama Needs to Do So That The US Leads the World on Climate Change
The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has just completed a series of landmark reports that chronicle an update to the current state of
consensus science on climate change.
The stated goal of the National Climate Assessment is to inform the president, Congress, and the public about up - to -
date science on climate change and its effects in the U.S.
Pruitt himself has gone on television telling the demonstrable lie that
the science on climate change is unsettled.
The science on climate change is turning in real numbers on where we, as a planet, are at, as well as where we are going.
Doubting or rejecting
the science on climate change no longer makes someone a «skeptic» or «denier» in the views of a leading news organization.
With 800 volunteer reviewers, the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-- the international body that assesses the state of
the science on climate change — was bound to leak.
These statistics, particularly for anyone who follows
the science on climate change closely, can feel overwhelming and leave one feeling helpless as the best chances for extinguishing the fires is the rainfall the country is finally receiving this week.
As said,
the science on climate change is solid, but we'd be happy to look at any specific research paper you think shows otherwise.
During that time, the IPCC put out two massive reports summing up
the science on climate change and won a Nobel Peace Prize.
But utilities like Southern Company, the parent company of Gulf Power, have wasted precious time by denying
the science on climate change.
The science on climate change is solid, but we'd be happy to look at any specific research paper you think shows otherwise.
The BBC is far from the only news organization to be criticized for misreporting or understating
the science on climate change..
If Webster and Abramowitz are right, that may have been enough to make large numbers of religious conservatives recoil from
the science on climate change and reject any messages about the need to reverse it.
Have you considered the possibility that some of the «criticisms from scientists who accept
the science on climate change» arose because those scientists are engaging with a different audience, skeptics such as Montford and Michaels, where simply asserting that climate change is «real and man made» does indeed miss the point?
In his maiden speech to Australia's Parliament, Christensen said: «Despite what the political and media elite tell us to think, the truth is
the science on climate change is not settled.»
«Everybody understands that the real question is, are we going to accept the new
science on climate change and are we going to act in a way to address that with the needs of the next couple of generations in mind?
In a recent hearing, Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe, who chairs the Senate environment committee, lambasted a senior EPA official, insisting that
the science on climate change is not settled.
The Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to plan infrastructure and other projects using the best available data and
science on climate change to mitigate risks to our armed forces serving domestically and abroad.
While
the science on climate change was limited compared to what we know today, by 1971 electric utilities knew enough to include research into the «effects of CO2» in the industry's long - term
While
the science on climate change was limited compared to what we know today, by 1971 electric utilities knew enough to include research into the «effects of CO2» in the industry's long - term research and development goals for through the year 2000.
A memo leaked to the New York Times in 1998 exposed its strategy of investing millions to muddy
the science on climate change among «congress, the media and other key audiences».
Slowly settling
the science on climate change as a spring migration forcer?
First, there's no ambiguity of meaning; politicians and journalists aren't left to make their own judgments about the state of
the science on climate change.
The science on climate change and extreme weather is nuanced, and sometimes hard to navigate.
It also says the companies «orchestrated a campaign of deception and denial regarding climate change» by funding efforts to discredit
the science on climate change even though their scientists had warned them of the risks and the role of fossil fuels in causing it.
His boss, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, has beenquoted often enough disparaging or countering
the science on climate change.