Sentences with phrase «superintendent evaluation»

The phrase "superintendent evaluation" refers to the process of assessing and reviewing the performance of a school district superintendent. It involves examining how well the superintendent is fulfilling their responsibilities and goals, determining their strengths and weaknesses, and providing feedback on their overall effectiveness in leading the school district. Full definition
Evaluation of the superintendent has been a key aspect of that work — MASB developed superintendent evaluation instruments and trained board members in their use nearly half a century before the requirements.
Home» Teaching in Virginia» Performance & Evaluation» Superintendents» Superintendent Evaluation Training Materials
The Board's action was based on recommendations from a Work Group on Superintendent Evaluation established by the Virginia Department of Education.
The Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Superintendents provide school divisions with a model evaluation system, including sample forms and templates that may be implemented «as is» or used to refine existing local superintendent evaluation systems.
If teacher evaluations are going to be dependent, at least in part, on standardized test scores, then certainly superintendent evaluation should be dependent, at least in part, on how well they do handling standardized per unit expenditures.
This session may not be necessary for participants who have attended Board Member Certification Courses (CBAs) 300 and 301, or who have documented participation in in - district workshops focused on superintendent evaluation conducted by MASB trainers.
School ADvance Superintendent Evaluation Options for Additional School Board and Superintendent Workshops
Instrument - Specific Training: This training covers the use of the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument including the cycle and processes of evaluation, rating superintendent performance on the rubric, as well as the use of evidence to evaluate superintendent performance.
Contributors to the NESCD report, though, maintain that certain matters, such as board and superintendent evaluations, should take place out of the public eye to allow for more - open discussion.
Submit for evaluation the goals, objectives and performance activities for the mentoring period to the superintendent
The core work of governance teams includes a major focus in the areas of strategic improvement planning, superintendent evaluation and board self - assessment.
Topics will include school finance, school law, governance and policy - making, superintendent evaluations, self - assessments, and a legislative update.
Pursuant to state law, superintendent evaluations must be consistent with the following performance standards (objectives) approved by the Board:
The Code of Virginia requires that (1) superintendent evaluations be consistent with the performance objectives (standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student academic progress.
The superintendent evaluation training materials are intended to help school divisions in aligning their current evaluation systems with the revised Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Superintendents.
The Yourtown Public Schools Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Handbook is designed to provide a prototype of a superintendent evaluation handbook established by a fictitious Virginia school division.
MASB provides training on its 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument to board members and superintendents via a cadre of certified trainers.
Construct validity was established for the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument.
MASB will seek to establish efficacy of the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument by surveying school board members and superintendents from a representative sample of school districts (see details below).
Validity, reliability and efficacy of the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument relies upon board members using evidence to score superintendent performance.
The complete MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument is available in the following formats:
To accomplish this, a representative sample of school districts using the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument will participate in a reliability study.
The MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument has three intended outcomes:
MASB staff and faculty involved in creating the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument Include:
While there are several types of reliability, MASB will seek to establish the test - retest reliability of the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument.
This training fulfills the requirement of evaluator training for board members as well as evaluatee training for superintendents whose districts are evaluating their superintendent with the MASB 2016 Superintendent Evaluation instrument.
In these days of transparency and expectations, one of the best ways to achieve this is to have a superintendent evaluation in place.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z