I have been struck by the lack of attention paid to the topic of
what's best for readers, in the blogs themselves and in the comments.
According to the comparison between eBook subscription services done by The Digital Reader, Scribd comes up with the service fee as low as $ 9 which might
be good for readers who normally buy 4 eBooks priced at $ 2 a month.
Word Wise automatically places short and simple definitions above difficult words,
which is good for readers learning English and kids learning to read (though I wasn't crazy about how much extra spacing it introduces between sentences).
While these
programs are good for readers, they may not always be the most beneficial for authors, except in that they expand the reading (not necessarily buying) audience for your work.
But in the case of publishing, while trad publishers may not all come out on top, the changes that are
occuring are better for readers, and I think for writers too.
The leading e-book devices, Amazon's Kindle and the Sony Reader Digital Book, allow you to scale the font, which
is good for readers with visual difficulties or aging eyes.
I want you to know that I feature only products here that I absolutely believe in, and getting a commission on them is just a smart bonus if I happen to have a link available to me... I am at all times looking out for
what is best for my readers and my reputation.
This novel would
be better for those readers who have a familiarity with Austen's works, as well as the Bronte's and other authors of the same time and similar genres.
We don't think an Amazon monopoly in
publishing is good for readers and there are also at least 25 percent of the digital reading market who don't have Kindles but some other device.
MMM, on the other hand, did filter out many deals that were awful, in favor or several that
were good for the readers.
Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will
be good for my readers.
This is an unsolicited review, and I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will
be good for my readers.
Please rest assured - we only recommend products and services that we use personally and believe will
be good for our readers.
I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will
be good for my readers.
Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will
be good for my readers.
We will judge what the government, London's politicians and the political parties do against this simple test:
is it good for our readers and good for London?
Regardless, I only recommend products I use personally and believe will
be good for my readers.
I feel
this is better for my readers so that you can get more ideas on how to style your items in new ways too.
Regardless, I only recommend products or services I believe will
be good for my readers and are from companies I can recommend.
For me, a major concern has been what
's best for my readers.
Every time I wondered what to do, I consulted my mantra: I needed to do what I thought would
be best for my readers, because I believed if I took care of them, they would take care of me.
Second, I thought it would
be better for the reader to come to conclusions about the likely effect of these events.
and publishers cooperating in a way that
is good for all readers.»
> This line of inquiry does not consider at all whether a subscription service might
be good for readers.
'» And
it's good for the reader to see him, for the eccentricities the elderly gent betrays are always good for a laugh, not least because of the inflated rhetoric he employs.
Nancy is helping to bring back out of print books, and that will
be good for readers.
Would
it be good for readers?