That's the conclusion of a Carnegie Institution for Science study published Tuesday that shows two things: Emissions from burning a lump of coal or a gallon of
gas has an effect on the climate 100,000 times greater than the heat given off by burning the fossil fuel itself.
People who believe human activity
has no effect on the climate staked a claim on the sun's role, declaring it responsible for the long - term warming trend in global temperatures.
Foukal et al did not claim to show that solar
forcing has no effect on climate, merely that there is no positive evidence for a longer term forcing larger than seen over the 11 year cycle.
That's the conclusion of a Carnegie Institution for Science study... that shows two things: Emissions from burning a lump of coal or a gallon of
gas has an effect on the climate 100,000 times greater than the heat given off by burning the fossil fuel itself.
A lot of these mitigation options are things we should be doing anyway — improving soil quality, reducing erosion — so this effort is going to help Kansas agriculture whether you agree that humans are
having an effect on climate change,» Rice said.
«We need to understand exactly what the magnitude of this [radiation] is and whether it is
having any effect on our climate,» Berger says.
I have heard theories that what we are seeing today is the result of C02 released 100 - 120 years ago, and that today's releases will start to
have their effect on our climate in 2120.
Therefore, it must be
having an effect on the climate.
3)
Has this effect on Climate been measured and where?