Sentences with phrase «valid marriage»

A divorce ends an existing, legally valid marriage.

Why, then, can they not recognize as valid marriages the union of same - sex couples who love each other and wish to share their lives together?

The only valid marriages are those which produce children.

He has written more than three dozen appellate briefs and argued cases before the Maryland Court of Special Appeals and Court of Appeals, resulting in five reported appellate decisions about significant family law issues, and one reported decision on other issues: Santo v. Santo, 448 Md. 620 (2016)(Joint legal custody: allocation of tie - breaking decision - making authority); Tshiani v. Tshiani, 466 Md. 255 (2013)(comity, proof of valid marriage); Das v. Das, 133 Md..

However, he is very clear that the objective indissolubility of sacramentally valid marriage can never be compromised.

«DOMA undermines both the public and private significance of state - sanctioned same - sex marriages; for it tells those couples, and all the world, that their otherwise valid marriages are unworthy of federal recognition,» Kennedy wrote in the opinion.

The Church is clear that if a couple attach conditions concerning the future to their consent there isno valid marriage.

Must all sacramentally valid marriages resemble my friends», beginning only after a few years of theological study, during a Mass set to music by Mozart?

Individual men and women effected valid marriage, and that was respected and enforced by both the Church and the state.

The Alaska court that hears the void or valid marriage case will make sure to determine parentage and enter custody and child support orders, or refer them to another court.

Yet Israel recognizes as valid marriages same - sex and opposite - sex marriages performed elsewhere.

However, if the court finds a common law marriage does not exist in your case, you will not be able to submit a separation agreement to the court and obtain a divorce because a legally valid marriage does not exist.

Marriage will also be legally valid and binding if performed abroad and registered in the United States, further all states in the United States are bound to recognize legally valid marriages from other states.

Putative - spouse laws protect spouses who genuinely believed they were in valid marriages even though they failed, inadvertently, to meet the requirements for a legal marriage.

An otherwise valid marriage can be voided in certain circumstances through the utilization of the annulment process.

Jurists of the so - called Classical Period debated what constituted legally valid marriage.

Individuals in other arrangements, such as civil unions, registered domestic partnerships, or other similar arrangements, that aren't recognized as a valid marriage under relevant state law won't be treated as married or as spouses as defined in this policy for federal tax purposes.

In the case of a de facto break - up of a valid marriage, another civil «marriage» is not permissible.

I insist: the absolute indissolubility of a valid marriage is no mere doctrine; rather, it is a divine dogma defined by the Church.

The result is to increase the number of annulments as it is discovered that there were «impediments» to a valid marriage and, at the same time, to elevate the level of understanding that should be brought to marriage.

In this debate, the «traditionalists» were in favor of truth (you can't receive Communion if you are in a state of sin; if you intend to have relations outside a valid marriage, you are in a state of sin; ergo, etc.), while the «progressives» were in favor of mercy (shouldn't those who have had a conversion after a divorce and civil remarriage be able to approach the Eucharist?).

Should it acknowledge that two previously married persons were suddenly no longer conjoined in a sacrament, or maintain its teaching that a valid marriage between two baptized Christians was indissoluble unless one of the partners died?

Also, until recently, black male + white female was not considered a valid marriage covenant.

During the Middle Ages there was no ecclesiastical definition of a valid marriage nor of any contract to validate one.

They emphasize that the actual capacity to generate children is not necessary for a valid marriage; after all, opponents of same - sex marriage acknowledge the validity of the marriages of men and women known to be sterile and hence incapable of havingchildren.

Its use in this Gospel passage shows that if a man and a woman are in fact married, the bond is inseparable, but if they entered into marriage illegitimately, i.e. not that they entered an illegitimate union with a third party, but that if their own sexual union was illegitimate because of impediments (such as age, relation or bigamy etc.), then their marriage was never lawful, never a valid marriage, and that they are, therefore, free to enter into a new valid marriage.

Divorce does not dissolve a valid marriage between baptised Christians.

«A valid marriage between baptised persons is said to be merely ratified, if it is not consummated; ratified and consummated, if the spouses have in a human manner engaged together in a conjugal act in itself apt for the generation of offspring.

Canon law, starting with Gratian in 1140, insisted that the consent of the parties is what made a valid marriage and that it must be free consent.

Yet in Ibsen's plays, the highest value the characters express is the individual's freedom of choice, regardless of when or how it is exerted or with what consequences.We should recall that the importance of free consent in the making of a marriage vow has been insisted upon by the Church just as much as the permanence and indissolubility of a valid marriage.

Sean is a supporter of Congressman Jerry Nadler's Respect for Marriage Act, which would ensure that valid marriages are respected under federal law, providing couples with much - needed certainty that their lawful marriages will be honored under federal law and that they will have the same access to federal responsibilities and rights as all other married couples.

The couple have now made contact with the GRO to ensure that a legally valid marriage can take place on their intended date.

For community - property rules to apply, there must be two things in play: a valid marriage and a residence in a community - property state.

Individuals in other arrangements, such as civil unions, registered domestic partnerships, or other similar arrangements, that aren't recognized as a valid marriage under relevant state law won't be treated as married or as spouses as defined in this policy for federal tax purposes.

While a common law marriage isn't technically a marriage since there is no valid marriage license nor recognized marriage ceremony, as an interpersonal status it's still recognized in some states for heterosexual couples.

Overview of an Annulment An annulment is different from a divorce: a divorce ends an existing marriage while an annulment means no valid marriage ever existed.

Unlike a divorce, which dissolves a valid marriage, an annulment declares that the marriage was not valid or proper in the first place.

- British Columbia's Family Relations Act states that even if there is a valid marriage contract, the court may re-divide the assets on the basis of fairness.

An important incidental question (Vorfrage) was whether there was a valid marriage under the applicable Syrian law at all.

The logic behind this is that there can not be a marital estate if there wasn't a valid marriage.

There is an escape clause in the act, however, giving a royal over the age of 25 the right to contract a valid marriage with whomever, provided notice is given to the Privy Council of the intention to marry despite refused consent and provided that both Houses of Parliament do not «expressly declare their disapprobation of such intended marriage.»

While an absolute divorce dissolves a valid marriage contract, an annulment ends an invalid marriage.

The first was «a declaration that the marriage was at its inception a valid marriage».

Accordingly, in place of the existing declaration his lordship would grant a declaration that the marriage, valid according to the law of Bangladesh, was not recognised as a valid marriage in England.

Divorce ends a legally valid marriage; annulment treats it as if it never existed and declares it null and void.

The previous law was clear that a voidable marriage was a valid marriage unless and until annulled.