Sentences with phrase «yield on cost»

I took a slight hit on portfolio yield on cost but nothing a 50 % dividend growth rate can't fix.

My dividend Yield on Costs on the acquired stock positions stands at 3.9 %, adding USD 140 to my projected annual dividend income.

The former numerical target of achieving 10 % yield on cost in 10 years has been dropped.

As discussed in Lesson 6, yield on cost means yield based on your original cost.

The numerical target is for the portfolio to deliver 10 percent yield on cost within 10 years of inception.

After holding for three years I realized that my other dividend growth investments had a higher yield on cost and the difference was only going to get greater as time went on.

In Lesson 6, we learned about yield on cost.

As I stated earlier, the principal goal for this portfolio is to create a dividend stream that grows to 10 % yield on cost after 10 years.

I know yield on cost isn't the best metric, but dividend growth is always nice.

Please note that the facts that I have a big gain or large yield on cost do not enter into the question.

Yield on Cost shows the dividend yield of the original investment.

Investment returns are expressed in annual terms, while yield on cost is a completely different measurement that doesn't consider how long an investment has been held.

You recall that the goal of the portfolio is a 10 % yield on cost by 10 years.

And investors who bought in at the start of 2013 are enjoying a 3.2 % yield on cost right now.

This addition also had a substantial impact on my portfolio yield on cost and my portfolio forward income.

That is, you will reach 10 % yield on cost in 10 years or less.

That is another step on the road to meeting the portfolio's goal of achieving 10 % yield on cost within 10 years from when I began the portfolio in 2008.

I know yield on cost isn't the best metric, but dividend growth is always nice.

Financial fundamentals are pretty sound and I've been more than pleased to enter into that interesting position, offering me a forward dividend yield on cost of well above 5.5 %.

My initial yield on cost for this dividend portfolio was 3.54 % and my expected annual income was $ 951.80 (before raises — see below).

I don't for a moment think TLS will be a 10 - bagger but if it grows steadily, it will provide a good dividend yield on cost with some decent price appreciation.

That allows me to make some projections regarding organic dividend growth and my expected Yield on Cost (YoC) in 2017 regarding these positions which I sumarised in the chart above.

As you can see in the chart above, December's purchases resulted in a total increase of $ 8.27 to my forward 12 - month dividends and carried an overall average yield on cost of 2.18 %.

Also my current yield on my cost base is 4.45 % and I am only holding 1 REIT (H&R).

For example, if you had bought Wal - Mart (WMT) in April 1990, your current yield on cost would be about 19 %.

Growing dividends over time incrementally increases yield on cost, and for the dividend growth investor, Enbridge's growth prospects are unique.

With Heineken you don't get a high dividend yield on costs when you enter into the position, neither strong annual dividend growth.

I like to say that your initial yield on cost is «locked in.»

Accounts opened later will have much different cost basis for each position and different yields on cost.

But when the current yield is a paltry 0.7 %, it takes a lot of growth to even get to a decent yield on cost.

Specifically, I want the portfolio to deliver 10 percent yield on cost within 10 years: $ 4678 by 2018.

Unfortunately my portfolio yield on cost decreased from 3.18 % to 3.08 % but again, dividend growth should bring it right back up very soon.

This purchase brings my Dividend Retirement portfolio yield on cost down to 3.17 % from 3.25 %.

A 4 % or 5 % yield is great but I think 10 - 15 years down the road my AAPL yield on cost will far exceed any utility stock I buy today.

My portfolio yield on cost remains unchanged at 3.53 %.

This corresponded to an annual dividend of $ 1.08 / share, for an effective yield on cost of 7.10 %.

Gurufocus also calculates the 5 - year yield on cost of BMY and JNJ at 3.77 % and 4.18 %, respectively.

The equation becomes this: Yield on Cost = 12 Months» Dividends / Original Price.

I think I've made my point above that the average cost basis must include reinvested dividends, so by definition the «purchased shares» method more accurately measures yield on cost.

I've got a post that touches on yield on cost coming up at SPF tomorrow.

So the portfolio's yield on cost soon departs from its initial yield.

On the plus side, if you are reinvesting dividends, the number of years to hit your target yield on cost will be reduced.

In this lesson, I am going to use yield on cost to show you how you can achieve a wonderful goal: To receive, each year, in dividends alone, an amount of cash that equals the market's long - term average annual total return.

Maybe in the long term (20/30 years) investing in blue chips companies will offer a better yield on cost without any work, but in the first years, rental investing could boost your income and let you financially independent earlier that expected.

One approach to screening for dividend growth stocks involves calculating a future yield on cost, or YOC, based on a stock's current yield and its past DGR (often the 5 - or 10 - year DGR).

To calculate yield on cost for a stock, an investor must divide the stock's annual dividend by the average cost basis per share and multiple the resulting number by 100 (to arrive at a percentage).