In a perfect world, there would never be a need
for abortion on demand for other than strictly medical reasons, yet ours is not a perfect world.
Many who have spent their lives working for racial justice may have little interaction with those who have spent their lives working to
end abortion on demand.
Rather, such socio - moral issues
as abortion on demand, the nature of marriage, and the rights of conscience and religious liberty offer us no intermediate policy outcome.
It was not long, however, before one woman's necessity turned out to be another's convenience, and
abortion on demand became the order of the day.
If this is left to stand, then the government can also FORCE religious schools to no longer teach creationism, government can FORCE religious hospitals to
perform abortion on demand, government can FORCE a Catholic DIOCESE (a diocese is separate from a church) to recognize gay marriage, government can FORCE prayer at secular public schools (opining it is best for the majority of the students), the government can FORCE...
The reason: «Proponents of abortion rights overcame Americans» qualms about the procedure with a long series of claims about the benefits of
unrestricted abortion on demand.
Further, an «ecumenism of the trenches» was already at work among many evangelicals and Catholics in local communities who found themselves standing side by side in
opposing abortion on demand and advocating for the traditional values of chastity, family, and community — all derived from deeply held religious convictions.
He says he will «never, ever sign a law» that the GOP candidate says would expand «
abortion on demand through nine months, and potentially performed by non-doctors.»
One thing making traditionalists of these young Americans, at least according to some of them, is the fact of their having grown up in a world characterized
by abortion on demand.
the person being voted for by these individuals probably does have the right scientific markings like, no God,
abortion on demand no matter how late in term, good in business and stealing (er) expropriating for personal gain, cheating on your mate, etc, etc. 2nd.
Conversely, conservatives should not fail to highlight the extreme views of liberals on social issues» for instance, supporting taxpayer -
funded abortion on demand throughout all nine months of pregnancy.
On the flip - side, a Marist poll found that only 21 percent of Democrats favor
legal abortion on demand for all nine months of pregnancy, and 56 percent support or strongly support a ban on abortions after 20 weeks.
Even before Roe v. Wade, he wrote and spoke
against abortion on demand and served as president of the National Right to Life Committee.
With each passing day another pro-life public figure» Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson, Al Gore, Bill Clinton» evolved to
embrace abortion on demand.
Within days of taking office, he was promoting the compatibility of soldiery and sodomy, and gleefully reversing very modest limitations on the abortion license - the latter on the very day of the annual pro-life march, and without the slightest acknowledgment that the great majority of Americans have deep moral anxieties
about abortion on demand.
«Federal taxpayer subsidies are helping pay for over 1,000 health plans that
cover abortion on demand, and [last week's] Supreme Court decision underscores that only Congress can put a stop to that,» said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).
The advocates of
abortion on demand falsely assume two things: that women must suffer if the lives of unborn children are legally protected; and that women can only attain equality by having the legal option of destroying their innocent offspring in the womb.
He said: «This is a very sad situation, it's a tragic situation, it's a horrific situation, but it's one that's enabled by a culture that
enables abortion on demand.
Liberty and Sexuality is his account of
how abortion on demand came to enjoy the protection of the United States Constitution and of why Harry Blackmun's rationale for individual autonomy (especially in matters sexual) should be retained and expanded.
Finally, there was Harold O. J. Brown, commenting in Christianity Today:» [Francis] Shaeffer asks whether Evangelicalism can tolerate in its fellowship those who are unwilling to
condemn abortion on demand; [likewise] the inerrancy group is asking whether it can tolerate within its leadership those who will not affirm inerrancy» («Assessing the Church of the 1970s: A Decade of Flux?
He argues that we must «protect the rights of unborn children» by
outlawing abortion on demand, readmit God to the classroom, and practice «military and moral rearmament» against the «evil empire» of Soviet communism.
Three years after Roe v. Wade had
made abortion on demand the most compelling moral issue of our times, 1976 was also the year a Southern Baptist of a different political bent, Charles Colson, Watergate villain turned prison reformer, published his own bestselling conversion story.
To the Republican it is about control and restoring America to its Christian foundation,
ending abortion on demand, restoring the sancti ty of marriage, reinstating school prayer, seeing that the various citizenry know their place and taking out the garbage.
If this is left to stand, then the government can also FORCE religious schools to no longer teach creationism, government can FORCE religious hospitals to
perform abortion on demand, government can FORCE a Catholic DIOCESE to recognize gay marriage, government can FORCE...
«There are still a significant number of Democratic voters who reject the abortion industry's incessant call for
unrestricted abortion on demand, and their party's embrace of that agenda,» said Carol Tobias, National Right to Life president, in response to the DNC chair.
I understand that the SNP candidate who won Glasgow East
opposes abortion on demand and is extremely uncomfortable with embryo experimentation.
The Republican says he will never sign a law that would expand «
abortion on demand through nine months, and potentially performed by non-doctors.»
More likely than not one of the next few federal elections will strongly favor the Democrats; this will not be a mandate
for abortion on demand.
@Ed, «Wait a minute... what's wrong with Christians trying to stop the legalization
of abortion on demand and same sex marriages?»
If he would denounce his positions on gay marriage and
abortion on demand it would help though.
And that contrast, finally, may spell the end of
abortion on demand, just as decisively as any future Supreme Court.
Abortion on demand — abortion at any time, for any reason — unleashes too many toxic results, which too many people know intuitively to be wrong.
Wait a minute... what's wrong with Christians trying to stop the legalization of
abortion on demand and same sex marriages?