Anyone who believes that the second goal can be discarded is not taking domestic politics seriously; anyone who would neglect the first is not
talking about climate policy.
That means society is going to have to make up its
mind about climate policies and related energy choices without certainty on the level of threat posed by business as usual.
So he has come up with a new formula that he says uniquely addresses the most inconvenient
truth about climate policy: It will be expensive.
On
questions about climate policy, the protection of biodiversity, the regulation of industrial pollution, and the use of natural resources, scientists and the environmentalists are in harmony: scientists tend to identify problems and environmentalists tend to see government regulation as a ready solution to those problems.
Since Deming's been a major influence in the leadership and management of much of the business world for decades, and specifically in the science of decision - making (including that of making
decisions about climate policy), it seems you've overlooked something.
That's what two men named David thought, too, when they first met in 2008 to talk
about a climate policy with very little support: a national tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions.
That framing costs as a foregone - gain increased the amount people were prepared to reduce emissions is noteworthy because public
messages about climate policy impacts typically frame the costs of reducing emissions as a loss [13]-- a pattern confirmed by our analysis of newspaper communications regarding the future costs of Australia's carbon pricing scheme.
Indeed, the discussions
about climate policy among economists have begun to take on a similar surreal quality to those that have characterized policy discussions at the U.N.'s climate confabs.
The repeated use of the term «undeniable» by bloggers and activists commenting on the report is merely the latest attempt by the warmists to claim that there's nothing more to be
said about climate policy — that the debate is over.
Michael Levi, author of a Council on Foreign Relations study of the Canadian oil sands, told the Washington Post that, with the decision, «the Obama administration made clear that it's not going to
go about its climate policy in a crude, blunt way».
Gore founded The Climate Reality Project in 2005 to further his grassroots efforts and is not afraid to make his voice heard when he feels
strongly about a climate policy, whether it's coming from a Democrat or Republican.
«In this case the assessment reaches conclusions inconvenient for political advocates on both sides — but that is how science works,» said Roger A. Pielke, Jr., a political science professor at the University of Colorado — Boulder, who's been writing on the evolution of the global change research office since its early days and has frequently been called on by Republicans in Congress to
testify about climate policy.
Once governments such as the UK's have made their mind
up about climate policy, they are then, naturally, able to mobilise many # millions to convince the public about what they are doing...
Prime Minister Abbott's speech «Daring to Doubt» described climate science with a skeptical viewpoint then went on to talk
about climate policy with an emphasis on Australia.
But before examining the scientific accuracy of Neil's latest comments, given that his show is a political one, let's first
talk about climate policy.
Obama will almost certainly veto those measures, of course, but there is no way his party will be able to avoid
debate about climate policy in 2016, as it did in 2012.
Exemplifying the proactive way authentic conservatives should be talking
about climate policy, former Environmental Protection Agency administrators William Ruckelshaus, Christine Todd Whitman, Lee Thomas, and William Reilly — all appointed by Republican presidents — gave Senate hearing testimony last week... Continue reading →
Discussions
about climate policy and related issues can be posted here, along with the usual things.
Brian assured him that we want this to be an ongoing conversation and discussion
about climate policy and CCL.
This same schematic of demarcated science and politics operates at all levels of debate
about climate policies.
When you're fighting to keep your house, grieving over the loss of a loved one or putting your life on the line to protect others lives and property, people talking
about climate policy or how these kinds of events will become more common and more severe is very uncomfortable.
This is actually the perfect time to talk about climate change and
about climate policy — it couldn't really be better.