The phrase
"big publishers" refers to large companies that publish books, magazines, or other written materials. These companies have a lot of resources and influence in the industry.
Full definition
Since then, we've seen much more discussion about the place
of big publishers in the publishing ecosystem.
Except the books
from big publishers often look like crap in digital and utterly mundane in print — no better than a well made self - published book.
You'll be competing
with big publishers with powerful sales teams who pay money to have their books featured in window and table displays.
Traditionally published authors have no intention of changing: About 90 % of authors who publish their books with
big publishers don't see themselves ever publishing their own books.
Big publishers who gave me a quarter - million bucks in advance for a couple of books that barely made it off the runway before crashing and burning.
If the shift in consumption is toward mobile devices, then author - entrepreneurs can compete just as well
as big publishers.
I don't think we'll ever go back to a time
when big publishers give marketing help to more than a handful of authors.
This is becoming easier as many editors and designers who work
at big publishers offer their work privately as well.
The news comes at a time when
most big publishers have restricted library access to their e-books.
This is still
how big publishers work and this is one reason why many authors choose to remain indie; to maintain creative control over their work.
Big publishers use their networks and connections to solicit reviews from newspapers, or ask other authors they work with to give a favorable blurb.
I don't
think big publishers understand how most readers have been accustomed to passing books to family and friends, borrowing from the library and buying used books.
While big publishers have larger budgets and more influence with bookstores, indie authors get to keep all their profits.
Smaller publishers will continue to grow into the areas left behind and become
big publishers over the years.
No, the one thing that's always defeated self - publishers going up
against big publishers is lack of distribution.
But to think that only
big publishers put out good covers or that you have to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for a cover is flat wrong.
It's a direct attack on who
big publishers feel threatened by: Internet platforms and web startups, as well as smaller, more innovative competitors.
It's an intriguing idea but it's never really hit the big - time, partly because
big publishers never bought into it.
And to your other point
about big publishers selling direct, I'm not expecting them to be very effective at it.
What I truly love about being an indie author is sharing my stories with a freedom that doesn't make my books any less than those who go
through big publishers.
A quick turnaround on a promotional author for one of the world's
biggest publishers sets the stage for a movie premier... and a great working relationship.
Also,
big publishers hold royalties over their authors and this can cut into the possible additional income of the authors and they may want to become indie publishers instead because of it.
Unlike big publishers our authors can get to know our staff, they are able to communicate with everyone from the MD to the publicity assistant.
You have to respect the publisher for bringing so many brand new experiences, something that other
big publishers fail to do.
With
big publishers increasingly avoiding risks and therefore pumping out more sequels, it's up to the smaller developers to continue moving the art form forward.
Will a «services model» for agents, analogous to
big publishers distributing small publishers, grow up to enable smaller players to continue?
Phrases with «big publishers»