For every 1 °F increase in temperature, the atmosphere can hold around 4
percent more water vapor, which leads to heavier rain and increases the risk of flooding of rivers and streams.
According to this scenario, warming temperatures heat up the surface of the oceans, increasing evaporation and putting
more water vapor into the atmosphere.
What's even worse is CO2 - induced global warming's positive - feedback assumption relies on
more water vapor entering the air.
We know that more open water will
put more water vapor in the air, and increase the sunlight absorbed each summer, both of which will lead to yet more warming.
Since water vapor is the most abundant and potent greenhouse gas, that additional water vapor warmed the atmosphere which warms the oceans and
produces more water vapor.
«Lightning is caused by charge separation within clouds, and to maximize charge separation, you have to
loft more water vapor and heavy ice particles into the atmosphere,» he said.
So the rising trend in the lower curve is going to represent much
more water vapor added to the atmosphere than the declining top curve represents as leaving it.
The incorrect sensitivity of climate to CO2 that the models have depends upon warmer temperatures
keeping more water vapor in the atmosphere.
But also
more water vapor bigger greenhouse but more reflection greater albedo dropping temps hence possible negative sensitivity in the long run.
Warm air typically
contains more water vapor than cold air; in fact, the amount of water vapor that air can «hold» increases exponentially with temperature.
The same effect will lead to drought in the dry seasons, because
much more water vapor is necessary to fill the air column so that it will start raining.
And climate change has led to
more water vapor in the atmosphere, which increases rainfall totals.
«Lightning is caused by charge separation within clouds, and to maximize charge separation, you have to
loft more water vapor and heavy ice particles into the atmosphere,» he said.
C. Going further to add in other contributors such
as more water vapor as a secondary effect of the increase in CO2 the temperature as a result of GHG should be even Higher.
They pointed to a warmer atmosphere, which
carries more water vapor to worsen rainstorms, as well as to higher ocean surface temperatures, which intensify hurricanes.
The notion of an H2O positive feedback (which probably is present on a clear day) is squashed by this process.While warmer air can hold
exponentially more water vapor, presumably increasing greenhouse effects (an process the IPCC hangs its collective hat on), it is also this exact same property that vastly improves the chances of convective and phase change heat transport by thunderstorms.
That vapor still coalesces into clouds, raindrops and snowflakes, which is why basic physics suggests that
more water vapor results in more rain.
So,
creating more water vapor artificially, using aluminum, barium, sulphates, or any other nucleator, seems just plain contrary to what they claim they are combatting.
A radiated IR photon is going to be absorbed directly, and not wait around for man to release CO2 to cause warming to cause
more water vapor molecules!
So far, data show the impact ejected only
slightly more water vapor than had been trailing the comet beforehand, suggesting the probe did not reach a frozen core.
Moreover, the warming makes the atmosphere damper (providing
still more water vapor) and may cause the stratosphere to heat up, speeding the chemical reactions that destroy ozone.
Phrases with «more water vapor»