This is true for any
kind of human understanding, whether it be applied to the phenomena of physical or biological nature or to a piece of literature.
But images and metaphors are also important
vehicles of human understanding and sometimes do better at communicating meaning and getting to the heart of the matter.
Instead of presenting an art endeavoring to reveal its contents to viewers with the least amount of interference, The Thing and the Thing - in - Itself features works that act out the limits
of human understanding as they create mysteries, pose conundrums, and leave viewers with provocative questions.
This exhibition utilizes Kant's approach to reconsider how certain twentieth - century artists engaged the frontiers
of human understanding in works that pit people's sight and insight against the limits of what they are able to comprehend, i.e. the things they believe themselves to be seeing as opposed to «things - in - themselves» (Kant's code word for humans» inability to move beyond their own constructed views).
Or are you saying that as of this moment we have reached the ultimate
pinnacle of human understanding, and that science will hereby cease and desist and no further learning about the universe can possibly ever take place because we know all there possibly is to know?
If «soon» is that different to God, and according to the Bible it is, then the statement is rendered essentially meaningless for
purposes of human understanding.
But to imperiously claim that anyone who reads the truth that was Jesus Christ differently than we do is thereby being tossed to and fro by heretical doctrinal winds seems arrogantly to ignore the
frailty of human understanding.
Since those process categories have been connected with ideas of God inspired by the Bible, process theologians believe there is a chance in the twenty - first century to bring the long separated parts
of human understanding into a new, coherent relationship.
In practice it is questionable because Neville seems to be asking for a kind of ultimate metaphysical explanation which may well be beyond the
competence of human understanding.
You have obviously realized this in younger life than I experienced, but I can tell you that as I grow older, I am less concerned with surrender to the brain washed traditions and practices of INDIVIDUAL
expounders of their human understandings than I was heretofore.
When Tennyson writes in In Memoriam of the way in which somebody can say, «I have felt», he is not describing a
distortion of human understanding nor is he commending sheer irrationality.
We have seen how the classical experience of reason was a release of the questioning
dynamism of human understanding and how this dynamism was restricted and deformed by authoritarian social structures time and again.
This ambiguity of the events to be understood by a theory of history — it may be pointed out in passing — is but a special instance of a general
impediment of human understanding.
As we develop our conception of theology as a critical discipline, we have an opportunity to raise new queries about the relation between the descriptive and the normative, and between the critical and the moral
dimensions of human understanding.
Caldecott is not making a romantic or antiquarian proposal: ancient and medieval understandings need to be adaptedto where we find ourselves now in the
story of human understanding.
Science does not try to explain anything «before existence,» because it's considered a tautology: an unanswerable question within the
sphere of human understanding.
They understand logical limits as arising out of the limitations
of human understanding rather than being based upon the nature of existence (Griffin, «Response» 257).
Alternatingly playful and elegiac, musical and imagistic, this long - awaited second full - length collection by Katz addresses the limits
of human understanding by examining the aftereffects of history and the complexities of parenthood.
Creed has designed the base of his sculpture as a social space, a stepped platform on which visitors may gather to enjoy the view — and perhaps debate the limits and
possibilities of human understanding.
Nah, this argument boils down to science, particularly which part of global sea level rise is scientifically attributable to human oil combustion at the current
state of human understanding.
Finally, the warmth and
depth of human understanding in this book can prompt reflection on personal values, professional satisfaction, and the possibility of peacemaking.
Communicating within a context
of human understanding allows one to consider others» previous knowledge and point of view when choosing the best communication strategy and delivery method.