In retirement he has produced a most important piece on the always difficult
problem of evil in light of the power of God.
In recent years numerous attempts have been made to solve the ancient
problem of evil by way of a Given within the nature of God, the assertion of «the demonic» in the world (its metaphysical status being somewhat cloudy), or a forthright reinstatement of the existence of a personal devil.
And no matter what it is, I doubt very much it's addressed the
evidential problem of evil... or, even worse, the problem of «why the hell does anything except Yahweh exist at all if he's actually self - sufficient and perfect?»
He gives voice to the
philosophical problem of evil perhaps more clearly and cogently than any other speaker or actor, any other philosopher or theologian, in the whole of world literature.
But for Griffin to imply that such efforts are (or were) excessive because the
real problem of evil is not one of logical consistency is problematic on two counts.
(Which does not mean, alas, that the liberating process will not be accompanied by suffering, set - backs and even apparent disasters: the
whole problem of Evil is re-stated (more comprehensibly, it seems to me, than in the case of a static world) in this vision of a Universe in evolution.)
For Dostoevsky, the gospel of suffering in communal love is the only lasting answer to the
perennial problem of evil and thus to the perennial question of human freedom.
Women and Evil by nell noddings university of california press, 284 pages, $ 25 For centuries theologians and philosophers have been struggling with the agonizing and
bewildering problem of evil.
If the evidence points to the fact that Holmes is a person with schizophrenia then the pastor needs to change his premise from the classical to the
evidential problem of evil and there the argument from free will is invalid.
«The ID movement's belief in evolution also allows them to distance themselves from
the problem of evil in the natural world.
The problem of evil is a perennially baffling intellectual puzzle that has generated countless monographs, articles, and anthologies.
as an atheist, you face a different «
problem of evil» than that faced by Christians.
It is a apologetic invented to evade
the Problem Of Evil.
Free Will is The Big Lie, the lame excuse to cover up the fact that Christianity is one of the worst failures of
The Problem Of Evil.
In his December 10, 2009, Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Barack Obama offered a vigorous defense of the just war tradition in response to
problems of evil and injustice in the world.
Aathiest — Ah yes, Epicurus» «
problem of evil».
If the ability to do this is necessary for a viable theodicy as Griffin implies, it would seem to follow that it is in fact possible to answer
the problem of evil within classical limits — i.e., without having to resort to Griffin's process conceptuality.
During a time when
the problem of evil confronts us constantly, Benedict continued, we must all wrestle with Nietzsche's proclamation that «God is dead!»
We shall first set forth Plantinga's classical defense for
the problem of evil.
I'll stop here, leaving Euthyphro's Dilemma and
the Problem of Evil for some other time...
On the other hand, the classical theist indicts the process theist for «solving»
the problem of evil by forfeiting a meaningful notion of divine omnipotence — i.e., advocating a finite, imperfect deity who is not worthy of worship.
I abandoned that when I realized most in that «organization» had THEIR heads in the sand, oblivious or uncaring about
the problem of evil.
The process theist indicts the classical theist for proposing a view of divine omnipotence that makes
the problem of evil unsolvable — i.e., renders the notion of divine goodness incoherent.
The process theists believe that the only way to solve
the problem of evil is to assume that human wills and nature as a whole have their own autonomy.
Times of intense suffering, both collective and personal, cause
the problem of evil to resurface.
The initial superiority of traditional theism over process theism erodes even more quickly when we look at
the problem of evil.
The classical theist indicts the process theist for «solving»
the problem of evil by forfeiting a meaningful notion of divine omnipotence while the process theist indicts the classical theist for proposing a view of divine omnipotence that makes the problem of evil unsolvable.
Griffin's other criticism is related to natural evil: «making C omnipotence a contingent matter, and limiting its scope to human existence, means that
the problem of evil in the subhuman world must be treated in terms of some other principle, and none of these has proved satisfactory» (GPE 272).
We, and our students, have written not only about God but also about
the problem of evil, Christ, the church, Christian education, pastoral counseling, preaching, the nature of human beings, history, liberation and salvation, spirituality, religious diversity, interfaith dialogue, science and religion, and other standard theological topics.
A doctrine challenged by science can be abandoned; a commandment that clashes with modern attitudes ignored;
the problem of evil washed away in a New Age bath.»
If God exists, the downside is
the problem of evil.
For some reason, I've been in a scholarly mood recently — I'm finishing up N.T. Wright's Justification (which, in a lot of ways, raised more questions in my mind than answers, and also made me want to read every other N.T. Wright book ever written, particularly Jesus and the Victory of God), and I've just borrowed Satan and
the Problem of Evil by Greg Boyd from my father, (a thick volume that is intimidating on the outside, but surprisingly accessible on the inside).
Our Father Abraham: Jewish Roots of the Christian Faith by Marvin R. Wilson, Jewish Spirituality: A Brief Introduction for Christians by Lawrence Kushner, The Myth of a Christian Nation by Greg Boyd, The Politics of Jesus by John Howard Yoder, Decision Making and the Will of God by Gary Friesen, Satan and
the Problem of Evil by Greg Boyd, A Concise History of the Crusades by Thomas Madden, and Manifest Destiny: American Expansion and the Empire of Right by Anders Stephanson.
His chapter on prayer was one of the best treatments of prayer I have ever read, right up there with the essays on prayer by C.S. Lewis and the chapter on praying in the Whirlwind in Greg Boyd's Satan &
the Problem of Evil.
At this point, we got into some of the nitty gritty, as I asked him about things like
the Problem of Evil and the preordained damnation of the non-elect.