Radiative gases are substances that can trap and emit heat in the Earth's atmosphere. These gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, act like a blanket, keeping the planet warm. However, when there are excessive amounts of these gases due to human activities, it can lead to an increase in the Earth's temperature, causing climate change.
Full definition
I believe I was quite clear in pointing out that this data did not exist for an atmosphere
without radiative gases.
There have been many «heated» discussions on various blogs as to the hypothetical structure of the atmosphere composed of no greenhouse gases, only
non radiative gases.
Try naming one planet or moon in our solar system that has managed to retain an atmosphere without
strongly radiative gases.
This sounds to me like a direct challenge to the hypothesis that
radiative gases create a greenhouse effect in our atmosphere.
But
if radiative gases could have some role in horizontal air circulation, what would be the consequences for vertical circulation?
«Nit picking to death the processes within the system won't change how the system as a whole behaves» — You have indicated that you are «Not interested» in discussing the critical role
radiative gases play in atmospheric circulation.
For an atmosphere
containing radiative gases, convective circulation continuously transports energy above the level of maximum IR opacity.
Even for an increase in CO2 by a factor of 10, the temperature increase does not exceed 2.5 ° K.» Even the IPCC
acknowledges radiative gases» inverse logarithmic influence on temperature.
Konrad; Could you please give me a direct yes or no answer to the following question — Do you believe that strong vertical tropospheric convective circulation would continue
without radiative gases?