If that problem could be solved, it would provide the longest record of
water vapor feedback driven by the largest change in temperature.
It in some sense includes but (as I understand it) in no sense measures the impact
of water vapor feedback on radiative equilibrium.
This study highlights the role of
water vapor feedback in amplifying the global cooling after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo.
The atmosphere and surface might very well heat up from enhanced GHE, but as soon
as water vapor feedback kicks in it will actually act as both a positive and a negative feedback.
The point is quite simply: The IPCC assumption of essentially constant relative with warming is not supported by the physically observed data, therefore the assumption of
strong water vapor feedback with warming is also not supported by the observations.
Nevertheless, the results described here provide key evidence of the reliability of
water vapor feedback predicted by current climate models in response to a global perturbation in the radiative energy balance.»
And, the evidence now suggests that a NEGATIVE
water vapor feedback cancels about 75 % of the previously assumed impact of CO2 (abstract found here).
This is
why water vapor feedback remains heavily debated in the scientific community, and even the IPCC admits that «an uncertainty range arises from our limited knowledge of clouds and their interactions with radiation.»
Phrases with «water vapor feedback»