Sentences with phrase «withdrawal rate studies»

Traditional safe withdrawal rate studies focused on liquidation strategies.

Their safe withdrawal rate studies contain no valuations adjustments.

I want to provide millions of people access to honest and accurate safe withdrawal rate studies.

Rob pointed out the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies in May 2002.

I put up my famous post pointing out the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies on the morning of May 13, 2002, Sensible.

Most traditional Safe Withdrawal Rate studies assume tax sheltered accounts, mainly because including taxes is difficult.

Rob Bennett's RobCast page 5 Early last year, Ed Easterling wrote a valuation based Safe Withdrawal Rate study at his Crestmont Research web site.

«My «reputation» is the result of the fact that I am the person who discovered the analytical errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies back in May 2002.

The original Safe Withdrawal Rate studies broke new ground.

And the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies remain uncorrected, do they not?

Juicy Excerpt: I knew that the safe withdrawal rate studies did not contain adjustments for the valuation level that applies on the day the retirement begins.

I believe that what you are looking for is the e-mail in which Wade expresses his concern to me about the threat that the Goons made to get him fired from his job for the «crime» of having publicly expressed his view that the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies need to be corrected now that there is a consensus in this field that they get the numbers wildly wrong, Diversified.

I learned of the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies by reading John Bogle's explanation of how Reversion to the Mean is an «Iron Law» of stock investing.

Valuation - Informed Indexing # 127 by Rob Bennett My good friend Mike Piper has written an article («Investing Based on Market Valuation») at his Oblivious Investor blog exploring my finding that the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies get the numbers wildly -LSB-...]

What happened is that I pointed out the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies in a post that I put to the Motley Fool site on the morning of May 13, 2002.

«I put up my famous post pointing out the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies on the morning of May 13, 2002, How many of the Old School studies would you say have been corrected in the 12 years since?»

Last week, we published the Tenth Safe Withdrawal Rate Study!

Some people tell me «oh, if you had just kept your mouth shut about the errors in the safe withdrawal rate studies, the Bogleheads Forum would still be at Morningstar and Microlepsis would still be posting and we would all be better off.

«The Safe Withdrawal Rate Studies Are Based on History.

I want to make it clear that none of this post should be construed as a personal attack on the authors of various Safe Withdrawal Rate studies.

Yes, dividends can get cut but at least they are tied to the real business fortunes as opposed to safe withdrawal rate studies that are purely based on historical data, and thus probabilistic in nature.

There are many people who will be going to prison as a result of the 11 - year cover - up of the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies.

I was writing about the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies 10 years before any of the Big Shots in this field.

The intimidation tactics were used as part of an 11 - year - long cover - up of the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies.

Do you think the world would be a better place or a worse place today if I had never put forward my famous post of May 13, 2002, pointing out the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies, Pink?

Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to another blog entry at this site: Admit it, this all about you seeking some sort of glory and acclaim and not at all about errors in withdrawal rate studies or investing strategies.

See article in the Wall Street Journal reporting that the numbers in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies are in error.

If the Wall Street Con Men have sufficient pull that they can get someone sent to prison for the «crime» of having discovered the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies, then the Wall Street Con Men have sufficient pull that they can get someone sent to prison for the «crime» of having discovered the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies.

You have engaged in death threats and board bannings and tens of thousands of acts of defamation and threats to get academic researchers fired from their jobs because you want to cover up the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies, right?

If it weren't for the 32 years of peer - reviewed academic research, I could say «Oh, there is no need for those Old School safe withdrawal rate studies to be corrected by the close of business today,» and not be committing financial fraud, which would land me in prison after the next crash.

«And the further reality is that if I * did * lack personal integrity, I could have made this all stop just by saying the meaningless sentence you want so desperately to hear: «I think the errors in the traditional safe withdrawal rate studies must be corrected by using Rob's analytically valid method.»

It's hard for me to argue with this statement given that the Post Archives show that I discovered the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies 10 years before any of the Big Shot «experts» in this field.

Juicy Excerpt: My claim to fame on the internet is that I am the person who discovered the analytical errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies.

It's called The New Consensus That the Safe Withdrawal Rate Studies Are in Error Is the First Step Towards Far Bigger Discoveries.

by Rob Bennett I gained my fame on the internet by being the person to discover the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies.

In the context in which it appeared, however (that is, in a world in which most investors and indeed even most investing experts have shown a woeful lack of appreciation of the dangers of the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies) I view this article as one that does more to add to the problem than to diminish it.

Rob, the Fellow Who Took a Sneak Peak at the Happy Ending of the Story Before Even Daring to Put Forward HIs Post Pointing Out the Errors in the Old School Safe Withdrawal Rate Studies

Valuation - Informed Indexing # 143 by Rob Bennett Just about everyone has given up on the Old School withdrawal rate studies.

Most of all, I am not going to commit a felony by joining you in your 11 - year cover - up of the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies.

I say that the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies got the numbers that millions of middle - class workers used to plan their retirements wildly wrong and that we will be seeing political turmoil for years to come as a result of this horrible mistake.