Sentences with phrase «global warming hypothesis»

At a recent protest rally, a scientist explained why he thinks the dangerous global warming hypothesis has been proved wrong.

Just another example of failed predictions based on the CO2 - centric anthropogenic catastrophic global warming hypothesis.

The consensus regarding the catastrophic global warming hypothesis is completely reliant on a proposed positive feedback producing runaway global warming that will destroy human civilization.

The anthropogenic global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions

The BRT did not inform the courts of research that shows a small Arctic cooling trend for the period 1901 to 1997, a trend contrary to the CO2 global warming hypothesis.

Kyoji Kimoto shows why the basic global warming hypothesis may be wrong.

Not everyone who subscribes to the current global warming hypothesis wants success in Copenhagen, though.

Recognition of the essential flaw in the dangerous global warming hypothesis predates the IPCC and has been there for the world to see in the title of a paper published in 1966 by CSIRO division of meteorological physics former chief Bill Priestley: «The limitation of temperature in hot climates by evaporation.»

The CAGW global warming hypothesis is rather straightforward: increasing atmospheric CO2 would warm the world in an accelerating, out - of - control manner.

This process prevents surface temperatures from significantly exceeding threshold levels (and therefore rules out the alarmists» Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming hypothesis in these areas) and controls maximum and minimum temperatures in these areas.

Conclusion: For a tipping point and / or runaway warming to be reached, and then survive, the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis demands that the lower troposphere warms in a consistent and accelerating mode, due to the hypothetical positive atmospheric feedbacks supposedly produced from fossil fuel CO2 emissions.

There's an easier way to go: Accept that the HadCrut temperatures are correct, or as correct as humanly possible, and that the last decade hasn't warmed as predicted by the anthropogenci global warming hypothesis.

The anthropogenic global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions

They appoint the members, control the data and fund most of the research, mostly to prove the human - caused dangerous global warming hypothesis.

Kyoji Kimoto reviews the basic global warming hypothesis.

Probably the most articulate article is The Global Warming Hypothesis and Ocean Heat by William DiPuccio.

A better approach might be, «What do you need to see in terms of evidence over the next few years to make you more likely to believe the Global Warming hypothesis?»

Finally, given the limitations of climate science (one Earth and all) they should describe what they would consider convincing evidence in favor of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.

And IF this were the basis for the global warming hypothesis, I'd be fighting against it!

Yes, but the polar cooling does flatly contradict the climate models that are the basis of the global warming hypothesis.

The «global warming hypothesis» has been developed according to the principles of sound science.

They are ignoring CLOUD results, just as they ignored Svensmark's decade old excellent work challenging the increasingly feeble, but politically powerful human - global warming hypothesis.

And finally, I asked you for some empirical evidence that a) demonstrates the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis; b) that was not based on computer models; and c) is not dependent on unsubstantiated correlation.

Got funding in 2000, the same year they published Singer's article, «Cool Planet, Hot Politics: The next president needs to know that the global warming hypothesis, though politically powerful, is scientifically weak.

Like the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis (AGW), research continued in spite of media and political acceptance.