Sentences with phrase «male leadership»

Yes, we must sometimes adjust our style to account for centuries of male leadership.

A significant share of the companies, 37 percent, have all - male leadership teams, while an additional 21 percent have only one woman.

One aspect of this difference can be explained by the value the wider society continues to place on male leadership.

I have been «called before» male leadership over 30 years, for expressing strong social justice opinions.

Half - way houses, therefore, must be deemed faulty when they approve women ruling men in secular affairs (because Scripture nowhere forbids it and sometimes exemplifies it) but not in the church or home (because Scripture requires male leadership in both), or when they approve women ruling in today's church (because Paul's restriction on this seems to be culturally determined) but not in the family (because biblical teaching on this seems to be transcultural and timeless).

Women have equally strong skills and gifts in the areas of church management, finance, administration and supervision; many of us have been reluctant to exercise those skills or claim those gifts because they may differ from male leadership styles.

Yet studies prove that organizations with women in power outperform their peer organizations with exclusively male leadership.

Good job, nuns, for standing up to your terrified and angry male leadership.

Guilty pietists were eager to accommodate, not least among them an aging white male leadership that had never recovered its confidence after the earthquakes of the sixties.

The manifesto states that, in accordance with Scripture, the TRUE woman will, among other things, «honor and support God - ordained male leadership in the home and in the church.»

And of course the Manifesto says nothing of submitting to male leadership if one's husband desires a polygamous family (as was allowed in Scripture, even if it wasn't specifically recommended), but instead says that the TRUE woman affirms that marriage is a covenant «between one man and one woman.»

Feminists who wished to maintain their connection with older peace organizations struggled to sensitize male leadership to sexist attitudes and to bring about more shared leadership between women and men.

And to the extent that we look to Jesus» selection of them, and the apparent marginalization of the women, as paradigmatic for male leadership in the church, we show ourselves to be people whose minds have not yet been transformed by the very story to which we are appealing.»

In contrast, complementarians «believe the Bible establishes male authority over women, making male leadership the biblical standard.»

The all - male leadership structure in Albany is conflicted out of any solution and should instead direct a panel of experts, with input from staffers who have themselves reported harassment, to interrogate the current process and change it.

Labour is set for an all - male leadership contest after Angela Eagle withdrew to offer her support to Owen Smith as a «unity candidate» to take on Jeremy Corbyn.

During the campaign, she defined herself as a feminist who understands the struggles of working families and immigrants, someone who could break barriers for the upper Manhattan district, which has long been dominated by male leadership.

American society «presumes male leadership in private and public affairs....

Indiegogo has 45 percent women and 55 percent men, and 43 percent female and 57 percent male leadership.

And the point is precisely to denigrate the parenting styles of «women,» and render them — the natural parent of children — artificially incapable of rearing their own young sans male leadership.

Ideal for such an experience is a female - male leadership team.

Women must lead from strengths and personal power rather than feeling compelled to duplicate the male leadership model.

You can try logic and compassion with your male leadership, but expect harsh retaliation.

Your male leadership will not accept a change in their power structure without a brutal fight.

Since it is mostly women who drive church attendance, it shows that women really don't care what the male leadership says.

One of my concerns about some expressions of complementarianism is this idea that «male leadership» somehow precludes the washing of dishes, folding of laundry, changing of diapers, etc., so that such work is the exclusive responsibility of women.

Looks like the male leadership in the catholic church can't throw their women counterparts under the bus fast enough.

This has combined with a growing sense that male leadership has proven incompetent, to render some of the theological arguments for restrictive male pastoral rule less credible, for better or worse.

Christian patriarchy is often illustrated as a series of umbrellas in which the male leadership of the church holds authority over the male leaders of their homes who hold authority of the women and children at the bottom of the hierarchy.

Although there may be some variation on the specifics, broadly speaking, complementarians believe that women are biblically - bound to submit to male leadership in the home and in church life, which means that husbands are ultimately responsible for decision - making on behalf of their families and that women should refrain from assuming leadership positions over men in a church setting.

For many women in the peace movements of the «60s, feminist consciousness was sparked by increasing recognition of the sexism of the male leadership in the peace movement itself.

One slogan of the movement, «Girls say yes to men who say no,» revealed the sexist insensitivity of the male leadership of the movement, it was assumed that women working in the movement were simply molls of the male resisters.

Paul's instructions for women to cover their heads in prayer are stated as emphatically as his instructions for them to submit to male leadership.

Passages about women submitting to male leadership are sandwiched between passages instructing slaves to obey their masters.

Complementarianism (also known as «soft patriarchy»): Christians who identify as complementarians believe that the Bible requires Christian women to submit to male leadership in the home, church (and, according to some *), society.

The hard patriarchy view generally requires women to submit to their husbands and to male leadership in the church in all things, and forbids women from taking leadership in the church or society.

[56] Inside the Labour Party, Harman has said she does «not agree with all - male leaderships» because men «can not be left to run things on their own»; and that, consequently, one of Labour's top two posts should always be held by a woman.

Harriet Harman has sparked controversy by criticising «all - male leadership», which she described as «a thoroughly bad thing».

Either they're out of touch or reluctant to look in - house at their male leadership.

If we'd had one for 70 years like we did an all - male leadership, it might be time to ban it, but why now?

But, if you want to ensure we don't have an all - male leadership, which we'd certainly like to, it could be the least bad option.

Well, first of all our society has become very feminine... If this is a joke or not judge for yourself but following the thought it's quite obvious that such features like healthy, self establishing aggressiveness, strong parenting, male leadership are counted as a positive with decreasing frequency.