The phrase
"to accept the science" means to believe and trust in the findings, evidence, and conclusions of scientific research. It implies acknowledging and embracing the information and knowledge that has been gathered through a scientific process, without doubting or denying it.
Full definition
And there were three witnesses that actually are sort of in the fringe of scientists who do not
accept the science of climate change.
Let's put elected officials on the science committee who
accept science as reasonable explanation for the world around us.
We
wholly accept science and the amazing leaps we as a species have made in it in the past 10 centuries or so.
By all
universally accepted science / medical definitions, it is usually # 1 with a bullet, re the cause of, subsequent control of — stress.
During the 2012 Republican Presidential primaries, even candidates
who accepted the science were forced to reject the scientific consensus in order to gain the support of their party.
Most members of the
public accept the science that says carbon pollution is heating the planet and that this will cause environmental damage.
This is climate denial of the status quo sort, where
people accept the science, and indeed make long speeches about the immorality of passing on a ruined world to our children.
Very few outlets — with the notable exception of The Washington Post — took the time to explain what exactly Soon claims about climate change (that it's caused by the sun), and how his claims fit in
with accepted science (short answer: they don't).
However please note that Pew Research shows while liberals do
accept the science more than conservatives its something like a 60 / 40 split, so not as hugely tribal as you are making out.
Remember that, during the run up to Copenhagen, the South repeatedly insisted that the
North accept a science - based reduction target at the «upper end» of the IPCC's 25 % by 40 % range (from the 1990 baseline, by 2020).
Moreover (and I am NOT a lawyer), but
by accepting the science of the «expert consensus,» does that not allow them to accept another, more refined, scientific conclusion should (or when) better science be introduced into that broader debate?
The goal of yourself and focus on the family is «spritual warfare», that is to replace
current accepted science (all fields), with creationism.
And things evolve, you know; nothing is created «through a vacuum»... your beloved Science has shown us that, so
Christians accept science as well.
After many years of confusion instilled by my religion, which is done I believe on purpose, I began to
accept science instead of myth as fact.
Pro-illegal drugs, even though science has deemed it harmful and dangerous, just
accept the science without spinning the truth, the human body is organic bio-chemistry, not herb chemistry!
«When one political party has the official position that climate change is a hoax, when we're politically divided as to whether we should
even accept the science, it's difficult to have a meaningful discussion,» Mann said.