Sentences with phrase «warming scientists»

Though such additional warming will have both positive and negative consequences for human beings and other life on the planet, global warming scientists believe that the negative consequences far outweigh the positive consequences.

What happened to the nice global warming scientists promised?

Now, here's an important point that global warming scientists don't mention.

What happened to the nice global warming scientists promised?

The new report, for example, slightly reduces the lower end of the estimated uncertainty range for the amount of warming scientists expect in response to a doubling of CO2 concentrations compared to preindustrial levels.

Before leaving CNS, Morano wrote an article featuring attacks on NASA global warming scientist James E. Hansen by George C. Deutsch, a former NASA press aide accused of censoring Hansen.

Excerpt: New York Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin publicly chastised NASA warming scientist James Hansen for promoting sea level claims that are at the upper boundary of what is «even physically possible.»

Global warming Some scientists believe there is a rise in CO 2 levels (carbon dioxide).

NASA Warming Scientist Hansen Blasts Obama's «Counterfeit» Climate Bill — Calls it «a monstrous absurdity... less than worthless!»

(To see an interesting graphic representation of the kind of warming scientists expect, check out this cartoon.)

even in the best case scenario, business as usual fossil fuel burning will almost certainly commit us to more than 2C (3.6 F) warming, an amount of warming that scientists who study climate change impacts tell us will lead to truly dangerous and potentially irreversible climate change.

I feel bad that Mr. Revkin couldn't get the administration to bite on what even some global warming scientists admit is an irrelevant, and most feel unquantifiable, «dangerous» level of global warming.

Get some luke warm scientists and give them some office space at the EPA.

Morano told Reuters: «The global warming scientists need to feel and hear the public's outrage at their shenanigans like climategate... There is no advocacy of violence or hint that people should threaten them... Public outrage is healthy»

Over the past months a spate of scientific papers published show sea level rise has not accelerated like many climate warming scientists warned earlier.

Global warming scientists learn lessons from the pause that never was by Graham Readfearn, Planet Oz, Guardian, May 3, 2017

The summary says that in the near term, at levels of warming that scientists say we are already committed to, there is a very high risk to Arctic sea ice and coral reefs.

«Even in the best case scenario, business as usual fossil fuel burning will almost certainly commit us to more than 2C (3.6 F) warming, an amount of warming that scientists who study climate change impacts tell us will lead to truly dangerous and potentially irreversible climate change.»

Yet the potential carbon emissions from oil, gas, and coal in the world's currently operating fields and mines would take us beyond levels of warming that scientists have determined to be safe.

The only thing that appears to be really true about climate change and climate scientists is that increased CO2 will arm the world but what the implications are of this warming scientists leave to other people.

Reports regarding Donald Trump describing climate change as «bullshit» and a hoax have reached the global warming scientists.

A professor once reminded me that in addition to global warming scientists, there are global freezing scientists.

I'm not a global warming scientist but as a doctor, I read a lot of medical literature.

Global warming scientists are under intense pressure to water down findings, and are then accused of silencing their critics The Guardian (U.K.) George Monbiot, April 10, 2007

In 1998, Michaels criticized NASA scientist James Hansen, a leading global warming scientist.

Kanya Kusano, program director and group leader for the Earth Simulator at the Japan Agency for Marine - Earth Science & Technology, called climate research conducted by global warming scientists «immature» and much like ancient astrology.

Another celebrity global warming scientist, Michael Mann, filed a similar defamation lawsuit against writers who disparaged him for his statistically manipulated «hockey stick» graph of historical temperatures.

«I don't have a big objection to think tanks sponsoring things... I don't think there's enough support for sceptics or critics as it is,» says the Ontario - based retired mining consultant whose blog inspired a hacker to break into servers at the University of East Anglia (UEA) and steal emails and data shared between the world's leading global warming scientists.

Adjacent is a chart that depicts the output of climate alarmism of catastrophic global warming scientists, versus scientific reality.

«Inhofe: Global - Warming Scientists, Media «Doomsayers» and Tools of «Hysterical Left»,» HuffPost, September 27, 2016.

Dr. Gleick had also allegedly forged a two - page «strategy memo» purporting that the Institute was engaged in a variety of efforts to fraudulently undermine the claims of global warming scientists.

The fiasco at East Anglia is a significant setback for the global warming scientists.

It seems to me that the Defendants would have the right to serve subpoenas on a lot of these global warming scientists and force them to produce their data.