Bishop John called
for change in the Church especially in the encouragement of vocation among people God is calling to ministry.
Sociologists have studied, probed, and measured
change in church membership patterns over the last twenty years, trying to understand the precipitous decline in membership.
Are you serious this is the last thing we should be concerned about when it comes to Catholic church what about priest (I use that word loosely they are sleeping with the choir boys and when they get caught they move them to another church so they can start again to me that is what they need to
change in the church in the name of JESUS I pray for that right now!!!
This is exactly Douthat's (and my) assessment of the spiritual meaning of the German bishops» call for
change in church discipline concerning divorce and remarriage.
The congregation I serve has been wrestling to discern
what changes in the church, what fresh wineskins, are needed to keep us faithful and open to the Spirit.
Her books with Rita Nakashima Brock, whom I also claim as a PhD student, are models of the sort of writing from which I have hopes of
spiritual change in the church.
Attitudes have begun to
change in churches where the senior pastors have made a regular and conscientious effort to use clergywomen as supply preachers, as workshop leaders and speakers, and as substitutes during pastoral emergencies or vacation times.
While I do
believe changes in the church could've changed those transitions, I also wonder if our practices, friendships and mindsets could have made a difference too.
But if you look at
how changes in Church have happened, you could argue 30 years ago the Church preached a lot, but didn't necessarily do a lot.
Couldn't one just as logically argue that the Vatican's refusal to permit even discussion of
changes in church order — despite a quasi-consensus among Catholic biblical scholars, historians and theologians for perhaps 15 years — is the more basic complicating factor?
Citing the work of Jesuits John O'Malley and Stephen Schloesser on Vatican II, he critiques a kind of Christian fundamentalism that substitutes «security», ie the refusal to accept
dynamic change in the Church, for the virtue of hope.
I hadn't intended it to be a comprehensive piece on the faith of millennials, just a commentary on how — generally, based on multiple surveys and my own experience — millennials in the U.S. long
for change in the Church that goes beyond worship style and marketing.
And Dean Hoge has observed that «in general, the number of people who have left because
of changes in the church is not as large as the number who have left because of lack of changes.»
I saw when that was
changed in the Church.
If this is going to
change in the church it will take a lot of leaders brave enough to look at people first and willing to leave the 99 to save the 1.
Those things that need to be
changed in the Church, and that can be changed, must be changed for the sake of the mission.
In upholding the prohibition against artificial methods of birth control, the encyclical dashed the hopes of many believers for
a change in church teaching — hopes that had been raised when the National Catholic Reporter leaked the news that the lay and clerical members of the hand - picked papal commission studying the matter had voted decisively to support the limited use of artificial contraception within the context of marriage.
By the decade's close, however,
these changes in Church and state were proving ephemeral.
«Thinking Catholics, who knew what had happened in Rome before the encyclical, who had absorbed all that Vatican II had to say about the Church as the People of God, had assumed that their concerns would be listened to and
change in the Church's stance on birth control was inevitable.»