The question of the reality of
evil is not normally where the debate is.
And these things are stupid more than they're evil (but the ability to use them
for evil is there).
They can imagine all sorts of
evil being done to those who believe that their faith is hollow and based on nothing but lies.
The men and women running around saving the nation / world / galaxy
from evil are not only fearless, but the finest physical specimens you will ever see.
So how did that entire society view that as OK up until recently if good and
evil are so black and white?
If evil is loose in the world, it is up to us to put a stop to it.
Remember this is a culture that had to argue over slavery and other basic civil rights, so the power of
evil is still prevalent.
Evil IS real in this world, but is not defined correctly in anybody's scriptures.
When evil is ignored or thought to be impossible it causes many bad things to happen.
Something evil is turning all the adults bad, and you are the ones to rescue them and save the island from ruin.
To the contrary, I'm saying that
human evil is universal in its effect and consistency.
In other words: a decisive choice of
evil is only possible given optimal grace.
Rather, he created a universe of beings in
which evil is a possibility and has indeed occurred.
The
greater evil is learner attention span — expecting your learners to spend a lot of time on their mobile phones to learn something new is expecting way too much.
For instance, if
evil is just the absence of good, like darkness is the absence of light, your argument bursts immediately.
It's because the classic tales of good
against evil are still highly entertaining.
Oh no, the forces of
evil are at it again, and they got your kid this time!
We don't know how
much evil is required to bring about a certain good.
It's hardly 100 years old, so already I'm wondering why an
ancient evil is attacking it again.
Indeed, it seems so, but just as everyone is celebrating your victory, the
true evil is revealed.
The moral gray areas ensure that good
vs. evil isn't clearly defined and since there are multiple endings, you'll want to play through it more than once.
This is because he thinks of a structure of existence as a quality of life, and clearly that life has superior quality in which these new types of
evil are overcome.
Our first consideration should be to recognize that
evil is inherent in the risky gift of free will.
Maybe it's the result of some or all «sins», but
evil is completely derived and carried out by humanity.
Some believe
evil is here to stay and there's nothing to do about it so why bother.
Most evil is done by good people who do not know that they are not good.
I believe that
evil was defeated that day and, its taking humankind time to make the choices not to do evil but come to a place of thriving, and peace for all.
That the emergence of spiritual existence is the emergence of enhanced possibilities for both good and
evil is nothing new.
But in novels,
evil is punished, and the good guys mostly win, after solving the puzzle.
So quoting from your pathetic book of
evil is supposed to convince me of anything?