FYI, this paper is already being widely cited on blogs
by global warming deniers as proof that all of the climate models are wrong, wrong, wrong and that the whole concept of anthropogenic GHG - caused warming has been refuted.
The other reason is, of course, that I expect we'll be hearing
from global warming deniers who will tout this finding as more proof that climate change isn't happening.
Under this sort of rule, environmentalist groups would have to accept
global warming deniers as members / officers, and African - American groups would have to accept neo-nazis, etc..
Rumour is that shock jock Glenn Beck will host the same old typical handful of
global warming deniers on his CNN special tonight.
So, the main answer to your query is «there's no logical reason
for global warming denying to be associated with conservatives, if you are willing to bypass partisan soundbites».
-- McConnell helped
notorious global warming denier Sen. James Inhofe (R - OK) try to block Al Gore's «Live Earth» concert in Washington, DC, by raising an objection to the resolution allowing the concert to take place on the capitol's West Front.
PBS should obviously not be contacting a fossil fuel -
funded global warming denying anti-science think tank which has previously compared climate realists to mass murderers for interview suggestions on a climate story.
Speaking of bothersome pests - Senator James Inhofe,
staunch global warming denier and human prune, went on the Rachel Maddow Show to discuss his new book, «The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future.»
Because of Trump's stated position that global warming is a Chinese hoax, and his appointment of
many global warming deniers to key positions, it was feared that his administration would slow or frustrate the publication of this report.
Against this,
global warming deniers such as yourselves have, predictably, seized upon the recent cold snap in Europe, which is said to be the coldest in 10 or 20 years (or in the case of the Czech Republic, since 1940), to convince the rest of us that all is well, after all.
«One has only to examine the motives of those who make their income from publishing books versus those who earn their income from doing science to get a hint of
why global warming deniers tend to focus on only the findings that support their view»
One has only to examine the motives of those who make their income from publishing books versus those who earn their income from doing science to get a hint of why
global warming deniers tend to focus on only the findings that support their point of view.
Global warming deniers however, as you have said, are obsessed by water vapour and good information is needed to show them how they are fooling themselves.
But what is surprising is that notorious
global warming denier S. Fred Singer was described at a skeptic conference today as a Nobel prize winner, a flat out lie.
Gingrich and Lomborg may not be
classic global warming deniers — since they realize denial is now politically and scientifically untenable — which is why I label them delayers.
Perhaps sparked by
global warming denier Jim Inhofe's recent appearance on the Rachel Maddow Show, Baldwin launched a series of tweets attacking Inhofe: -LSB-...]
Virginia Attorney General and
global warming denier Ken Cuccinelli has been rebuffed by a state Circuit Court judge who ruled today that Cuccinelli's politically - charged subpoena against the University of Virginia and climate scientist Michael Mann lacked an «objective basis.»
Worst idea: 2009 seems to have been the year that
global warming deniers shifted from claiming that climate disruption is a hoax to claiming that climate disruption is too big and too far along to stop, so there's no point in doing anything about it.
This is powerful, though not really news, for those unaware of the aggressiveness and obstinate cultivation of ignorance via conspiracy theory of the denial campaign: «
Global warming deniers guilty of attack on science»
I am certainly
seeing global warming deniers and others taking this information and running with it (like here, for example, or here, and on Benny Peiser's CCNet on March 7, 2007, though I don't have a link for that).
Senator James Inhofe (R - OK), a
longtime global warming denier who has called man - made climate change «the greatest scientific scandal of our generation,» criticized the award and asked the Justice Department to investigate prominent IPCC scientists for possible academic misconduct (they were never charged).
Quickly dubbed «Climategate»,
global warming deniers jumped on this, trying to show that these scientists were engaging in fraudulent activities.