To accept the answer means to agree with or acknowledge the response or solution given to a question or problem. It implies that you believe the answer is correct or satisfactory.
Full definition
The insurer
accepts your answers as fact when originally writing your premium, but all insurance company's check on your driving record before deciding your actual risk and premium rate.
, and if we refuse to
accept answers from the world, the question will not be what we ask but what is asked of us.
The fact that you can't or choose not to
accept my answer makes me (in your eyes) unable to be taken seriously and seeking an alternative to reality.
And I think one of the issues is that nobody
ever accepts your answer in the media so it just gives way to a feeding frenzy.
I
already accepted an answer, which I found convincing, I just wanted to add this to show that I do not think it is a trivial issue.
To satisfy both the logical and emotional side of our brain, we not only have to complete the equation, we have to
fully accept the answer.
The
most accepted answer as to the highest possible credit score has been 800; however, it's because it's the most widely used number.
Do
n't accept an answer that both of the dog's parents had good hips so we did not need to check them.
Accepted answer seems to imply (without evidence to prove that implication) that school funding disparity causes school districts to be better or worse.
@Joe: I have
accepted you answer because it makes the most sense to me and because you managed to build the bridge from my point of you to what seems to be the generally accepted convention.
I fail to understand
how accepting any answer, let alone a far - fetched one, is somehow better than admitting that you just don't know what the correct answer actually is.
«We need people who know how to delve into the issues and ask the right questions and not be bluffed
into accepting answers by the [Mangano] administration that may not be accurate.»
The
currently accepted answer points out that in the case in question the defendants didn't commit first degree murder due to there not being premeditation nor was the death even intentional.
You are obviously incapable of
accepting that answer so you'll either insult me for asking them, dodge them by acting like it's stupid to even ask them, or you'll offer a collection of «answers» that are not supported by the biblical account of the flood and ignore scientific realities.
I'll
also accept the answer of «nothing» that will change your mind because at least we'll agree that since nothing can change your mind it's impossible to debate or even hold a discussion with you and we'll go our separate ways.
We call this process experimental, which basically means that we don't know the answer with certainty at the beginning (nor can we
simply accept an answer on authority without testing it), but only when the experiment is over.
A difficult choice
for accepted answer, but amongst the two submitted at the same time, and after reviewing the edit history, I have to opt for the concision and specific focus of bringing together Article II, Section 1 with Section 4.
P.S. I think this question does not differentiate denominations of Islam, but if I would
completely accept answers that may suggest different approaches regarding different denominations.
I'll
accept the answer based on any flavor of libertarianism (except left wing libertarians in the mold of Matt Zwolinski).