This is overcome by removing the surplus
electoral vote from the candidate receiving the lowest portion of the popular vote.
Without performing the actual calculation, it's easy to see that the
more electoral votes a state has, the more power (as per your definition) it will have.
Note that federal constitution has systems for preventing popular states from dominating congress or the white house by the great compromise or
electoral voting system.
This is theoretically achievable by winning with a one - vote margin the states with the highest ratio of
electoral votes per capita.
Some states are «proportional», giving a candidate a percentage of
electoral votes based upon their percentage of the popular vote.
But solution 2 will not work if for example there are exactly four persons
receiving electoral votes, each with the same number of votes exactly.
By awarding each state an number of
electoral votes equal to the number of congressional delegates, the smaller states get more sway.
It also creates the unfortunate situation that a candidate can win the popular vote but still lose the election because of the
way electoral votes are distributed.
The compact would only take effect once states with a combined 270
electoral votes among them — the amount needed to win the presidency — had joined.
Every four years, presidential candidates lavish attention (and, more important, campaign promises) on a dozen or so swing states
whose electoral votes are up for grabs.
This is a form of proportional representation applied to the electoral college: It splits each state's
electoral votes in accordance with their popular vote percentages.
In the recent 2012 election, if all states had switched to «proportional» allocation
of electoral votes, what effect would that have had on the outcome?
It is key to note that not all candidates who run for office will
receive electoral votes, as they will need to meet a popular vote threshold specific to each state.
New York lawmakers have approved a bill that would enter the state in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement to
award electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the majority of the popular vote.
Even if the state polls are to be believed, President Obama faces daunting odds to approach the past presidential records for
electoral vote totals.
Electors were needed as a mechanism that allowed, if the need arose (nobody got
enough electoral votes to get elected, a candidate died, etc.), to negotiate a solution in a timely manner (because each consultation with their home state could take weeks)
In a Proportional Electoral College, election procedures would maintain the currently
allotted electoral votes and the requirement for 270 to win, however the process of casting votes, distributing votes to candidates, and tackling contingencies, such as tie breaking, would take a new form.
If the scenario in this answer occurs for a state with very
low electoral votes, then you could have the popular vote and not even be an option for Congress.
When no candidate candidate achieves the 270 threshold, the 50 state delegations in the House are to choose between the top three
electoral vote winners which would include the winner of the single district.
If put in the right light, Democrats and Republicans would love this idea (like the 3 Senate seats for the Dems and a
swing electoral vote in the EC for the GOP).
A combined quarter of a million dollars will go to the 2nd Congressional Districts in Maine and Nebraska,
where electoral votes are up for grabs.
Notably, Hispanic support of the standards is 34 points higher than Hispanic opposition in this
crucial electoral voting bloc.
Henrique Costa, a law professor at Universidade de Brasília, who is currently an advisor to the Brazilian government on the testing of Ethereum blockchain network in
processing electoral votes, gave a contrasting opinion.
While Florida remains the only swing state that's still too close to call, Obama bested his Republican challenger Mitt Romney regardless, as he raked in at least 303
electoral votes during yesterday's election.
Reagan and Bush both received a much
larger electoral vote than the Times» man in the White House, yet we are told that they are guilty of extremism for agreeing with the great majority of Americans that abortion should be contained, with or without a view toward eventual elimination.
I don't see how it could possibly favor his or her choice... well, unless you are talking
about electoral votes (US)
This is exemplified in Table 2 where a distribution of 57, 37 and 6 per cent in a state with 10
electoral votes translates into 6, 4 and 1 votes respectively.
Proportional distribution of
electoral votes maintains the foundation of the Constitutional Framers» original intent, while providing a positive alternative to the current system.
Or alternately, assume each citizen gets to vote for one elector for the congressional district and one
senator electoral vote (each state split in half.)
Gerrymandering is when a partisan committee moves around the borders of voting districts to favor their own party, squeezing the maximum amount of
electoral votes possible out of a certain area of land.
The Senate also granted final legislative approval Saturday to a bill allowing Connecticut to join an interstate compact that would ensure the state's
electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote, provided enough other states join the agreement.
I have found this Excel file that contains values for 2016 general election and this article that
contains electoral votes breakdown per state.
Phrases with «electoral votes»