Sentences with phrase «free speech»

It speaks volumes that you are one of the defenders of free speech regardless of what we might say.

Or it may be actually none of those things; instead, athletes may be doing so in support of free speech rights, or in solidarity with those who are engaged in protest.

There is also a body of law on free speech for students which is age dependent to some extent.

And you may not like it, but there is an ancient tradition of free speech in this nation.

As the university year draws to a close, it is a perfect opportunity to reflect on what appears to be a disastrous 12 months for free speech on campus.

The purpose of protecting free speech, making sure media power is not concentrated, information is not secret, and so forth, was to protect democracy itself.

There is no such thing as free speech, there is always a cost.

Amazing you guys are all about free speech as long as it's something you want to hear.

Thus the union shop denies her constitutional right of free speech by using her money to speak for purposes with which she disagrees.

The police have no place interfering in free speech issues outside of those I outlined earlier.

People who express them are spreading lies and propaganda — which isn't free speech at all.

Do you agree with free speech proponents on the repeal of section 13?

A school is not an area open to the public, so free speech does not apply to any outside agency like a religion or other private group.

The association actively supports free speech, literacy, and programs that support local and independent retail shops.

They limit free speech and are dangerously aggressive to anyone who does not have the same ideas.

It has drawn huge opposition from human rights and free speech advocates.

The pressing need for reform has resulted in an unprecedented campaigning alliance between free speech groups and science.

An assault on free speech at an institute of higher education highlights both the power of rhetoric and the convenient philosophical inconsistency of identity politics.

The suit claims that the state's rules governing lawyer advertising violate free speech by preventing lawyers from presenting factual information about their services.

We live in a country that allows free speech to a degree unparalleled elsewhere in the world.

Governments must defend free speech for those who stand for science and progress.

The whole episode is part of a wider trend of restricting free speech in the name of protecting particular identity groups.

The nature of free speech online is one that will be continually discussed for years to come, and it is unlikely any product is a perfect fix.

At the same time, however, the incident has become a magnet for an ongoing debate over free speech and freedom of the press, and the gray line between private and public.

You don't have free speech if everyone can only say what isn't offensive to anyone.

People who value free speech above all can gather in one corner, while those who want to avoid hate speech or triggering language can associate somewhere else.

But principles like free speech are not valued highly by many global warming activists.

Free speech only works for people who have enough brains to understand what is being said.

Free speech includes the right not to say anything.

Though the site faced heavy pressure from advocacy groups, among others, many defended it under free speech claims.

We will publicly and actively oppose censorship and promote free speech within the publishing industry through the content we post to our site and to blogs.

As collective individuals they have a right to influence through free speech and voting, the moral landscape of their society.

Then the answer from many people would be «No» because to deny funding threatens free speech and freedom of expression.

It is not an abuse of free speech just to express something somebody else disagrees with.

That's what free speech is all about, right?

If that had been the end of it, mall owners and managers would have found themselves with the authority to prevent citizens from engaging in free speech activities on mall property.

We know we are in trouble when the right of free speech becomes a right to unlimited pornography.

The report authors also say they have seen significant new activity by political conservatives seeking to protect political free speech by companies, among other issues.

How will the commission balance free speech and censorship?

Are we taking the right to free speech too far, or is all of this virtually harmless?

Free speech rules the day and that should be the end of the story.

It's just a question of free speech after all, right?