Across the nation, tens of thousands of parents opted their children
out of standardized tests in 2014, and this year, many more have or will do so.
The new evaluations are based on a combination of teacher practice and student achievement, which includes the controversial use
of standardized test scores.
The controversy over the use
of standardized tests for evaluation purposes is the result of the assumption that those tests currently in widespread use are capable of differentiating between effective and ineffective teachers.
When the first
round of standardized testing scores came out, it was no surprise to me to see that the charter school beat all the local public schools hands down.
Amid complaints of disruption and angst in the classrooms, the state's major teachers union launched a petition drive asking parents to protest the use of a new
set of standardized tests.
Among their objections: the requirement of a statewide teacher evaluation system that includes the use
of standardized test data.
Whether it's an unhappy parent, the
pressure of standardized tests, students with behavior challenges, or something personal, staff members go through difficult patches.
This might reduce the number
of standardized tests students take, especially if they attend school in a district that has adopted numerous local tests on top of what the state requires.
But the
value of standardized testing in terms of better understanding and improving a public education system as vast and fragmented as ours is undeniable, right?
The findings from these and other studies raise some serious questions about using results from state standardized tests to rank schools or compare them to other schools in
terms of standardized test performance.
In spite of their exposure to much higher - achieving peers and a more challenging curriculum, marginal students admitted to exam schools generally do no better on a
variety of standardized tests.
In this
world of standardized testing ~ does our current system of evaluation in education mirror the real world ~ where students will spend the rest of their lives working and striving for success?
It covers the
cost of standardized tests, after - school programs, school buses, heating and cooling for school buildings, safety, and school lunches.
While you wouldn't know it based on the shallow media coverage, many educators consider the new
generation of standardized tests to be far superior at assessing student learning than any previous tests.
So, the next time you hear someone cite research during a heated debate over, say, the
effects of standardized tests, ask how the research was conducted.
Because value - added analysis accounts for the challenges inherent to urban classrooms, value - added
analysis of standardized test results is fair.
And while some see portfolios as excellent qualitative measures
instead of standardized tests, we know that the subjective nature of portfolio assessment can make it an unreliable comparison between schools.
If you wish standardized tests to be «absolutely trustworthy» you do not understand the
nature of standardized tests or accurate procedures for evaluation of student achievement.
The
purpose of a standardized test is to provide us a comparable metric for a small subset of what schools are supposed to produce, and it's very valuable for that purpose.
However, other factors at the secondary level such as higher number of students and growing
prevalence of standardized tests for secondary students could strengthen the value - added measure at the secondary level.
Right now, students across the nation are embarking upon a
series of standardized tests following intense days and weeks of test preparation accompanied by anxiety and worry from both parents and educators.
The left - leaning national organization looked at the number
of standardized tests given in 14 districts — both urban and suburban — in seven states during the 2013 - 14 school year.
Phrases with «of standardized tests»