Remember what I said earlier: The models produce the result that there will be a lot
of anthropogenic global warming in the future because they are programmed to reach this result.
A broad survey of climate change literature for 2017 reveals that the alleged «consensus» behind the
dangers of anthropogenic global warming is not nearly as settled among climate scientists as people imagine.
This effort should be seen for what it is: a shameless attempt to silence my scientific research and writings, and to make an example out of me as a warning to any other researcher who may dare question in the slightest their fervently held
orthodoxy of anthropogenic global warming.
It is a fundamental
tenet of anthropogenic global warming theory that all the warmth at a planetary surface above that predicted by the S - B equation is due to those GHGs rather than atmospheric mass.
If we acknowledge that 97 % of climatologists agree with the
concept of anthropogenic global warming can we a) agree that 97 % is less than 100 %, and b) that scientists have, throughout history, repeatedly come to majority conclusions that were wrong, and therefore c) admit that consensus on issues of scientific inquiry conveys no moral or intellectual prerogative?
Phrases with «of anthropogenic global warming»