"Liberation theologians" refers to religious scholars or thinkers who believe that the teachings of their faith can be used to bring about social and economic justice, particularly for marginalized and oppressed groups in society. They focus on addressing issues such as poverty, inequality, and oppression, and believe that their faith calls them to work toward the liberation and empowerment of these marginalized groups.
Full definition
The first three sections of this paper have illustrated this, indicating the changes needed on the side of process theology as it responds to the truth of
what liberation theologians are saying.
But the question I am asking is how North American theologians can appropriately respond when they acknowledge the truth, and the critical importance, of what they hear
from liberation theologians.
The question now is whether there is any point of contact on the side of liberation theology for the concerns of process theologians in areas to
which liberation theologians have paid less attention.
But there is another dimension of the problem of development that became apparent to process theologians before it was noticed
by liberation theologians.
The insistence on the value of other creatures seems to
many liberation theologians to be an effort to impose on poor people unnecessary limits to the way they go about meeting their urgent needs.
We often overlook the fact that Africa and Asia are producing an impressive cadre of
liberation theologians who deserve an equally wide hearing as they reflect their own indigenous situation.
For seventeen years Tony Clarke, an Anglican, directed the Social Affairs department of the Canadian bishops conference, working in tandem
with liberation theologian Gregory Baum.
To reckon with Barth, then, is to encounter one whose theology later inspired
liberation theologians in Latin America and antiapartheid theologians in South Africa — a theologian who felt that what you pray for, you must also work for.
Walker's vision as an African American
liberation theologian gives his essay its strength, and tears asunder his harmonious vision of Hartshornean idealism.
Similarly, the quite different issues raised by feminists properly have a priority for us that they do not yet have for
most liberation theologians.
Liberation theologians want to make sure that Christian faith will not be used as ideological support for selfish interests and repressive situations.
Yet Benedict was suspicious of
liberation theologians because some aligned themselves with political movements that sought to overthrow repressive governments in Latin America, other historians say.
«Although they
[liberation theologians] talked about the option for the poor, the poor ultimately opted for Pentecostalism,» Ramirez says.
Process theologians can hardly read the writings of
liberation theologians without being pleased to see that many of their emphases are highly congenial.
The two - phase view also overlooks the
way liberation theologians, according to McGovern, remain for all their changes «fundamentally anticapitalist and still convinced that Latin America suffers from a dependence on the world - capitalist economic system with its center in the North.»
He insists that even those who
urge liberation theologians to take capitalism more seriously need to acknowledge that the realities of politics and markets often choke democratic capitalism.
Existential theologies are intensely private and
inward Liberation theologians have charged that God becomes the alibi for not engaging with the world.
Liberation theologian Jon Sobrino reminds us of the second century Christian Irenacus, who claimed: Gloria Dei vivens homo, the glory of God is that the human being will live.
Whether it be conflict from his childhood when he was raised in Muslim household, or from his time in Hawaii when his Communist mentor likely eschewed any religion, or during college bringing him closer to a community likely agnostic at best, atheist perhaps, followed by years in which he sat listening to Black
Liberation Theologian Wright, his relationship with Christianity's basic tenet is uneasy to say the least.
This is not to suggest that Niebuhr was the
first liberation theologian (an honor that probably belongs to Jesus de Nazareth), but simply to suggest that as we North Americans confront liberation theology in its properly indigenous forms — whether in Asia, Africa or Latin America — the similarities to Niebuhr's thought are a help rather than a hindrance in that encounter.