They can even urge the schools to talk
about religious freedom and to discuss the role of religion in national life.
How different the world would be, if we simply stopped
talking about our religious beliefs, our political beliefs and actually did something to help each other.
One thing can be said
about all religious people though, they ALL think they are correct and the rest of the population are wrong.
In addition, there seems to be another, less familiar sort: people who don't see the need to think
about religious matters at all.
I think the average atheist knows
more about religious doctrine than he does about scientific matters.
The absence of factual
information about religious television led to speculation and rumors which were proved false through verification.
Yet that should not prevent a vibrant argument
about religious truth, with each faith respecting the right of the other to disagree.
And the
thing about religious value experiments, why they are different from others is, of course, that the payoff isn't even in this life.
Don't make politically - charged
statements about religious convictions that the government doesn't approve, even if you're at a private meeting in your own church.
However, it is not his photography that I have a problem with — it is his ignorance of religion, yet he is writing a
book about religious houses of worship.
They usually don't even have half a clue about the ideas, evidence and science they are rejecting and they know even
less about the religious dogma they are backing up.
The author explores these elements and possible points of contact with elements in Christian tradition and experience, raising questions
about religious language: reality, analogy and metaphor.
This would help students understand how to be critical and selective about the things they hear in the media
about religious groups.